Chapron and Arlettaz (2008), in turn, suggest implementing an impact factor based on an estimation of how much worse the SHP099 solubility dmso conservation status of an endangered species or ecosystem might be in the absence of the particular research. Practical implementation should be regarded as an integral part of scientific conservation activity as it constitutes the ultimate assessment of the effectiveness

of the recommended conservation guidelines; it should therefore be rewarded as such (cf. PD0325901 clinical trial Arlettaz et al. 2010). A possible approach towards a better synergy between research and action is the elaboration of citizen-science projects (Salafsky et al. 2001, 2002). Such citizen-science approaches not only increase awareness of biodiversity research, but also bring together conservation science and management as various stakeholders (scientists, conservation management organisations, and citizens) work together. Volunteers (mostly citizens) benefit from educational input while the scientific project profits from large data sets being assembled (see Silvertown 2009). This approach is exemplified by the European butterfly monitoring scheme (van Swaay et al. 2008), established over large parts Doramapimod mw of Europe. Citizens

were engaged for butterfly counting, and by doing so they were able to document the recent status of (endangered) species and allowed to infer population trends. Another example of a good integration of research and practice is the non-governmental organisation Conservation International, and the governmental European Forest Institute. There are also peer-reviewed journals, such as the Journal of Conservation Evidence (run on a site called ConservationEvidence.com), that successfully translates scientific results into practitioner advice. This journal also publishes reports from practitioners on the outcomes of their interventions—successful or otherwise; data from these reports can then be fed into

systematic reviews. However, this journal is not included in the Web of Knowledge Mannose-binding protein-associated serine protease (i.e. it has no formal impact factor) making it less attractive for scientists as a suitable publication outlet. We hope that this contribution will encourage scientists to develop a practice-oriented research agenda and a basis for developing conjoint activities with the intention to use synergies from both, conservation science and conservation management. Scientists from fundamental biodiversity should not camouflage their research as conservation evidence, but conservation biologists should translate their findings to make the knowledge generated accessible to practitioners. Acknowledgments We thank all participants of this survey for informing us by their opinion. We are grateful to the Editor-in-Chief for helpful comments on a draft version of this article.