(A) Cells number was counted after trypsinization every 24 hours to draw the growth curves of Eahy926 cells and A549

cells (P > 0.1); (B and C) Cell cycle analysis was performed on FACSCalibur flow cytometer. The percentages of cell population in subG1, G1, S or G2/M phases were calculated from histograms by using the CellQuest 3-Methyladenine cell line software; The data represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (P > 0.05). Adhesion, migration and invasion in vitro To investigate the adhesion ability of Eahy926 and A549 cells, we counted the number of cells attached to extracellular matrix (Matrigel) by MTT assay. The adhesive ability of EAhy926 cells was found stronger than that of A549 cells. The OD value of Eahy926 cells was significant higher

Linsitinib nmr than that of A549 cells (0.3236 ± 0.0514 VS 0.2434 ± 0.0390, P < 0.004, Figure 2). We sequentially established Transwell chambers to detect the ability of cell migration and invasion. The migration ability of Eahy926 cells was found stronger than that of A549 cells (28.00 ± 2.65 VS 18.00 ± 1.00, P < 0.01, Figure 3A and 3B), while the invasion ability check details of Eahy926 cells was significantly weaker than that of A549 cells (15.33 ± 0.58 VS 26.67 ± 2.52, P < 0.01, Figure 3C and 3D). Figure 2 Adhesion of Eahy926 and A549 cells with Matrigel in vitro. (A) For adhesion test, extracellular matrix (Matrigel) was used. Representative images of Eahy926 and A549 cells adhered with the Matrigel after incubation for 1 h; (B) Number of adhesive cells with extracellular matrix (Matrigel) was measured by MTT assays. The difference in adhesion ability between Eahy926 and A549 cells was shown as OD value (OD: optical density).

Independent experiments were measured in triplicate and repeated three times for each cell type; Columns, mean of independent experiments measured in triplicate and repeated for three independent times; bars, SD (P < 0.004). Figure 3 Migration and invasion of Eahy926 and A549 cells with transwell chambers in vitro. (A) Cell migration was evaluated by Milliwell assays. Cells migrating from to the lower surface of filters were stained with hematoxylin solution. Representative images of Eahy926 and A549 cells on the lower side of a membrane after incubation for 6 h; (B) The difference in migration ability between Eahy926 and A549 cells; Columns, mean of independent experiments measured in triplicate and repeated for three independent times; bars, SD (P < 0.01); (C) Invasion assay was conducted by using invasion chambers. Representative images of Eahy926 and A549 cells on the lower side of a membrane after incubation for 16 h; (D) The difference in invasion capacity between Eahy926 and A549 cells. Columns, mean of independent experiments measured in triplicate and repeated for three independent times; bars, SD (P < 0.01). Tumorigenicity in vivo In order to test tumorigenicity of these cells, 1 × 106 Eahy926 cells or A549 cells were subcutaneously (s.c) injected into the nude mice.