Gozho GN, Krause DO, Plaizier JC: Ruminal lipopolysaccharide concentration and inflammatory response during grain-induced 17DMAG mouse subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2007,90(2):856–866.PubMedCrossRef 45. Khafipour E, Krause DO, Plaizier JC: Alfalfa pellet-induced subacute ruminal acidosis in dairy cows increases bacterial endotoxin in the rumen without causing inflammation. J Dairy Sci 2009,92(4):1712–1724.PubMedCrossRef 46. Nozière P, Michalet-Doreau B: Effects of amount and availability

of starch on amylolytic activity of ruminal solid-associated microorganisms. J Sci Food Agric 1997,73(4):471–476.CrossRef 47. Ghorbani GR, Morgavi DP, Beauchemin KA, Leedle JA: Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials on ruminal fermentation, blood variables, and the microbial populations of feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 2002,80(7):1977–1985.PubMed 48. Raeth-Knight ML, Linn JG, Jung HG: Effect of direct-fed microbials on performance, diet digestibility, and rumen characteristics of Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2007,90(4):1802–1809.PubMedCrossRef 49. Stein DR, Allen DT, Perry EB, Bruner JC, Gates

KW, Rehberger TG, Mertz K, Jones D, Spicer LJ: Effects of feeding propionibacteria to dairy cows on milk yield, milk components, and reproduction. J Dairy Sci 2006,89(1):111–125.PubMedCrossRef Selumetinib datasheet 50. Chiquette J, Allison MJ, Rasmussen MA: Prevotella bryantii 25A used as a probiotic in early-lactation dairy cows: effect on ruminal IMP dehydrogenase fermentation characteristics, milk production, and milk composition. J Dairy Sci 2008,91(9):3536–3543.PubMedCrossRef 51. Chaucheyras-Durand F, Durand H: Probiotics in animal this website nutrition and health. Beneficial Microbes 2010,1(1):3–9.PubMedCrossRef Competing interest The probiotics used are the property of Danisco SAS. Author’s contribution AL, PN, CM, MS, DPM

and CB designed the study. CB initiated the funding from Danisco. AL, PN, CM, MS and DPM participated in the animal experiment. AL did the biochemical and molecular experiments, analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. AL, PN, CM, DPM and CB revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Background Pseudomonas syringae is a Gram-negative plant pathogen that causes a spectrum of speck, spot and canker diseases on a range of plant hosts. It is divided into approximately 50 pathovars (pathogenic varieties) that are specialized for particular host plants and are generally unable to cause disease on other species. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) has shown that many pathovars correspond to distinct evolutionary (monophyletic) lineages [1, 2]. A notable exception to this pattern is P. syringae pv. avellanae (Pav), where two distantly related lineages within P. syringae have converged upon a common disease phenotype on hazelnut (Corylus avellana) plantations in Greece and Italy.