This explains the poor knowledge of prey characteristics and seabird diving behaviour within these habitats. www.selleckchem.com/products/BIBW2992.html Below, several methods that could provide these data are discussed. As hydroacoustic sonar methods can record both prey behaviour [92] seabird dives [103], [104] and [107] and predator–prey interactions [103] and [104] at fine spatiotemporal scales, a single deployment could provide much of the data needed to answer fundamental questions (Section

4.3). They also have several other benefits. Firstly, hydroacoustic sonar methods are unaffected by low light and high turbidity and therefore have advantages over others that can record underwater behaviours, such as video cameras. Secondly, they are also flexible in their application and can be deployed from vessels to target several micro-habitats within a survey [104], or from static moorings Selleck Pictilisib to monitor single micro-habitats over extended time periods [108], [109] and [110]. Having said this, hydroacoustic methods do have

some shortcomings when recording seabird dives as they cannot discriminate between species underwater. Moreover, the narrowness of sonar beams often makes collecting whole dive profiles difficult. However, having observers on vessels or alongside moorings during hydroacoustic sonar surveys can help to overcome identification problems [103], [104] and [107] whereas estimating dive depths is often possible by using trails of air bubbles that persist behind diving seabirds to trace their movements [104]. Combining several sonar beams to increase the overall coverage could also overcome these issues. In addition to the development of GPS loggers (see 2.4.3 and 3.4.4), there have also been developments

in time-depth recorders Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) (TDR) that record individuals′ subsurface movements. When GPS loggers and TDR devices are used in combination, they have the ability to record the location, depths and durations of foraging dives [55]. As devices are attached directly onto individuals at the nest site, dive profiles can also be attributed to species. The major limitation is that these methods are most suitable for Black Guillemots and Cormorants that usually forage within a few kilometres of their nest sites (see Section 3.4.4). As these species generally exploit benthic prey items [8], their dive depths are perhaps more predictable than those exploiting pelagic prey [8].