, 2011 and McLeod et al., 2009), (2) the nature and extent of law governing tenure (Sanchirico et al., 2010 and Techera, 2010), (3) the rates of urbanization, societal and economic change (Daw et al., 2011), and (4) the complexity of local patterns of ecological connectivity (Cowen and Sponaugle, 2009 and Jones et al., 2009). Because tropical Protein Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor coastal seas are vast, needs for effective management are great, and stretch both human and financial resources. Effective systematic use of MSP needs to be guided by priorities that focus management attention where it is most needed, particularly where localized, discreet actions, such as the establishment of small scale MPAs

or community-based management regimes, cannot stem the tide of degradation. We suggest that first order priorities for MSP can be identified by a simple measure of distance from urban centers, as a proxy for evaluating where pressures and conflicts are the greatest (Fig. Regorafenib 3). But we took our analysis beyond the simple, linear approach pictured in Fig. 3, to map gradations in intensity of human impacts across the coastal sea by integrating distance and population density as a simple proximity index (Fig. 4). Factors determining ecosystem health will usually trend positively with the population proximity index (Halpern et al., 2008 and Burke et al., 2012), and this permits a non-linear zonation of activities based on changes in degree of

expected human impact (Fig. 4). Fig. 4a shows filipin the global variation in population proximity index scores. Shelf regions in Southeast Asia and India have the highest index scores and the former also have some of the largest continental shelf expanses in the tropics. The detailed map of a region within Southeast Asia (Fig. 4b) illustrates fine grained details of warm water coral reefs (in red, Millennium Coral Reef Mapping Project, 2010) and gradients of population proximity on the continental shelf. There are an estimated 310 million people (Bright et al., 2012) in this region with 300 million of them living within 100 km

of the coast. Mean population density is 160 km−2 inland and 197 km−2 within 100 km of the coast. Maximum population density is approximately 68,000 km−2. Globally, 26% of the total area of reefs is in shelf regions with a population proximity score of 0. Fifty percent of the total reef area is found in areas with population proximity values of 75 or less. The main point of Fig. 4 is to show that implementing a population priority index for a coastal region is technically straightforward; determining the scores at which to partition the gradient will require common sense, tact, and attention to local data on aspects of environmental quality and tradition of use. The proximity index can be used not only to highlight priorities for management action and use of MSP; it can also guide marine planning within a priority region.