amazonensis infection in comparison to CBA cells. However, the mechanism by which these differentially expressed genes affect the course of Leishmania infection remains unclear. Further studies should be conducted to investigate the influence of baseline gene expression signatures on the outcome of L. amazonensis infection with respect to www.selleckchem.com/products/INCB18424.html host genetic background. Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Andris K. Walter for providing English revision and consulting services. Disclosure The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest exist in the present study. Financial support This work was supported by grants and fellowships from FAPESB (Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa no estado da Bahia), CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) and CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento). Veras, PST holds a grant from CNPq

for productivity in research (306672/2008-1). Electronic supplementary material selleck inhibitor Additional file 1: Table S1. Differentially expressed genes in uninfected macrophages from C57BL/6 vs CBA mice. (DOC 268 KB) Additional file 2: Table S2. Expressed genes in L. amazonensis-infected C57BL/6 macrophages. (DOC 136 KB) Additional file 3: Table S3. Expressed genes in L. amazonensis-infected CBA macrophages. (DOC 40 KB) Additional file 4: Table S4. List of primers used in RT-qPCR amplification of gene expression in uninfected and L. amazonensis-infected C57BL/6 and CBA macrophages. CAL-101 mouse (DOC 68 KB) Additional file 5: Figure S1. Comparative

analysis of the kinetics of infection by L. amazonensis in C57BL/6 and CBA. C57BL/6 or CBA inflammatory peritoneal macrophages were plated (2 × 105/mL) for 24 h and infected with L. amazonensis stationary phase promastigotes at a ratio of 10:1 (parasite to macrophage). After 12 h, cells were washed, reincubated for additional 6 or 24 h and then fixed with ethanol for 20 min. After H&E staining, the percentage Fossariinae of infected cells (A) and the parasite numbers per macrophage (B) were quantified using light microscopy at each time interval. Results are representative of two independent experiments performed in quadruplicate ± SD. (Mann-Whitney *p = 0.05). (TIFF 5 MB) Additional file 6: Figure S2. Network built using differentially expressed genes in L. amazonensis-infected macrophages from C57BL/6 and CBA mice. C57BL/6 and CBA macrophages were cultured separately, then infected and processed for microarray analysis as described in Materials and Methods. The cell cycle network was modeled using IPA®. Genes marked in gray represent those found to be differentially expressed between C57BL/6 and CBA infected macrophages, while unmarked genes were added by IPA® due to a high probability of involvement in this network. Similar to Figure 2, the above network is displayed as a series of nodes (genes or gene products) and edges (or lines, corresponding to biological relationships between nodes). Nodes are displayed using shapes as indicated in the key.