Confounding by indication is not supported as an explanation for

Confounding by indication is not supported as an explanation for the associations we observed with CHDs in our main analysis unless the types and severity of headaches for which butalbital is prescribed differ from those treated with triptans (eg, if butalbital was prescribed for more severe migraine headaches). However, in the exploratory analysis of smaller case groups, elevated ORs were observed for single ventricle among both butalbital and triptans users. Although it was a criterion for exclusion from analysis, maternal pregestational diabetes Opaganib was much more common among infants with single ventricle compared with control infants and compared with infants with other types

of birth defects. The relationship between diabetes and migraines is not well understood; however, there is evidence of an association between insulin-resistance and migraine headaches.[19] It is possible that untreated/undiagnosed insulin resistance is a confounding factor in the analysis of migraine medications and single

ventricle. Given the small number of infants with single ventricle exposed to either butalbital or triptans, our findings may also be explained by chance. We did not find evidence that the other active ingredients in EPZ015666 butalbital products are responsible for the associations observed for butalbital-containing products. Other ingredients in butalbital products (in combination products also used for migraine and tension headaches) were associated with 1 noncardiac defect and with left ventricular outflow tract obstruction defects but not with any other type of CHD whereas butalbital products were associated with various conotruncal, right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, and septal defects as well as single ventricle, and with nonsignificant elevations for certain left ventricular outflow tract obstruction defects. An NBDPS analysis by Feldkamp et al of single-ingredient-acetaminophen click here use and a range of birth defects observed patterns of associations that are not similar to those we observed for butalbital. No significant associations were observed with CHDs; all ORs for CHDs were less

than 1.5.[20] Similarly, an NBDPS analysis of maternal caffeine consumption and CHDs found only a few nonsignificant positive associations and no association with pulmonary valve stenosis.[21] If our results were due to coexposures to other migraine medications, we would have expected that exclusion of infants whose mothers reported those medications would have caused most of the positive ORs to move closer to the null. The ORs became more unstable but did not change in a predictable way, suggesting that coexposures are not responsible for our findings. The strengths of our study include the clinically well-characterized case groups resulting from clinical geneticists’ classification of case infants using pathogenetically uniform case definitions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>