These cells delivered matrix metalloproteinases-13 and -9, respectively, into the hepatic scar. The effector cell infiltrate was accompanied by increased levels of the antiinflammatory cytokine interleukin 10. A reduction in hepatic myofibroblasts

was followed by reduced fibrosis detected 4 weeks after macrophage infusion. Serum albumin levels were elevated at this time. Up- regulation of the liver progenitor cell mitogen tumor necrosis factor-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) preceded expansion of the progenitor cell compartment. Increased expression of colony stimulating factor-1, insulin-like growth factor-1, and vascular endothelial growth factor also followed BMM delivery. In contrast to the effects of differentiated macrophages, liver fibrosis was not significantly altered by the application of macrophage precursors and was exacerbated by whole BM. Conclusion: learn more Macrophage cell therapy improves clinically buy Staurosporine relevant parameters in experimental chronic liver injury.

Paracrine signaling to endogenous cells amplifies the effect. The benefits from this single, defined cell type suggest clinical potential. (HEPATOLOGY 2011;) Chronic liver injury results in scar deposition, hepatocyte loss, and ultimately cirrhosis. The only effective treatment for endstage liver disease is liver transplantation; however, organ demand exceeds available supply. There is, therefore, an urgent need to develop alternative therapies for cirrhosis. BM (bone marrow)-derived cell populations influence the progression and recovery phases of liver fibrosis.1-3 Clinical studies of BM cell therapy for cirrhosis are under way. However, the use of mixed cell populations limits

the understanding of mechanisms of action.4 The identification of defined single cell types with beneficial effects will enable rational and predictable therapy. Macrophages have a broad repertoire of context-dependent immune, inflammatory, trophic, and regulatory actions.5 selleck chemicals llc We have previously shown that upon cessation of chronic liver injury, endogenous macrophages mediate hepatic scar remodeling through local matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression.2, 6 BM precursors differentiate into macrophages under the control of colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) via its receptor (CSF-1R). CSF-1 also regulates macrophage proliferation, viability, and phenotypic fate.7 Furthermore, exogenous CSF-1 stimulates macrophage infiltration, improving fibrosis and function in models of renal8 and cardiac9 injury. Developing therapy using cells from the monocyte-macrophage lineage therefore holds promise. In chronic liver injury, hepatocyte proliferation is impaired and liver progenitor cells (LPCs) become activated to supply hepatocytes.10 LPCs are not of BM origin11, 12; however, their activation is influenced by a number of paracrine signals that represent potential targets for BM-derived cell therapy.